Patent submitting technique for rising robotics firms

Take heed to this text

Voiced by Amazon Polly

Robotics is at present acknowledged as one of many fastest-growing areas in know-how, and this fast growth reveals no signal of slowing down. These applied sciences have turn out to be essential to various industries, from automation and synthetic intelligence to safety, manufacturing, electronics, and even medication. Nasdaq stories that robotics applied sciences are anticipated to broaden globally at an annualized fee of twenty-two.8% over the following decade. It’s estimated that by 2030 the robotics sector shall be value $214 billion because of demand for developments within the business.

A sturdy patent portfolio is vital to an rising robotics firm’s development and success, however constructing such a patent portfolio takes technique, time, and cash. Thorough examination and understanding of an organization’s particular person enterprise goals, the panorama inside the robotics business, and country-specific patent guidelines and laws are all necessary elements to make sure that sources are allotted appropriately and {that a} patent portfolio submitting technique meets the corporate’s wants.

This text goals to supply steering on creating patent submitting methods in each the US and abroad.

Fundamentals of Patent Submitting

Why File? An issued patent grants a patentee the best to exclude others from making, utilizing, or promoting the claimed invention, corresponding to novel robotics know-how, within the nation that issued the patent, thereby giving the corporate an edge over opponents in addition to serving to the corporate entice buyers. A sturdy patent portfolio, nonetheless, not solely protects the patentee’s know-how from being copied, however it can be employed as leverage for cross-licensing or partnership alternatives that may present the patentee entry to further applied sciences.

When to File. In most jurisdictions, an issued patent’s lifetime expires after twenty years from the submitting date of the patent software. Corporations could resolve to delay the filings of patent functions for his or her innovations in the course of the analysis and growth phases, so the patents stay in pressure when the product is extra mature and profitable. Nonetheless, the draw back of this technique is that it expands the universe of prior artwork, and thus could end in a narrower scope of safety, and even no safety in any respect.

One other frequent oversight in the course of the analysis and growth stage of a product or invention is its public disclosure previous to submitting a number of patent functions directed towards the invention. A public disclosure could also be a printed article, a presentation, or a suggestion on the market. Publicly disclosing previous to submitting just isn’t essentially deadly in the US as a result of the U.S. permits a one-year grace interval earlier than the applicant’s personal disclosure qualifies as prior artwork. In distinction, many overseas jurisdictions, together with Europe, Japan, and China, implement an “absolute novelty” normal in figuring out what qualifies as prior artwork. Subsequently, prior artwork in such jurisdictions consists of every part made accessible to the general public, whether or not by a 3rd social gathering or the patent applicant themselves, anyplace on this planet, earlier than the submitting date of a patent software. Accordingly, candidates aren’t awarded a “grace interval” from a public disclosure in such jurisdictions.

If candidates wish to get forward of prior artwork and public disclosures, they need to file functions as early as moderately doable. There isn’t a requirement to truly scale back an invention to follow earlier than submitting a patent software. Subsequently, as soon as an invention is totally conceived, an organization ought to contemplate starting the submitting course of.

Sorts of Patent Functions
Utility patent functions cowl how a know-how works and, in the US, typically fall into certainly one of two classes – provisional functions and non-provisional functions. Noting the excellence between the 2 will be essential for creating a submitting technique. Design functions can be filed to cowl the decorative design of a product.

Provisional Functions
A provisional patent software is a much less formal patent software that may be filed with the US Patent and Trademark Workplace (USPTO) to determine a precedence date for the invention. Provisional patent functions, uniquely, aren’t examined by the USPTO and can’t turn out to be an issued patent. As a substitute, the provisional software will be transformed inside twelve months of the provisional software’s submitting date to a non-provisional patent software, which might then be examined and issued as a patent.

Typically, a provisional software needs to be as full as doable. Nonetheless, provisional functions require fewer formalities than non-provisional functions. Whereas at the very least just a few claims could also be useful to outline the invention, a provisional software could also be filed as solely a specification with none claims directed towards the invention, and with casual drawings.

Whereas not examined, provisional functions stay helpful for establishing an earlier efficient submitting date for a number of non-provisional functions that declare precedence to the provisional software. The precedence date is necessary because it serves to find out what prior artwork can be utilized towards the non-provisional software. For instance, the sooner efficient submitting date primarily based on the provisional software would restrict the scope of the prior artwork that antedates the provisional software’s submitting date, moderately than the precise submitting date of the non-provisional software. Moreover, the one-year time period of a provisional software doesn’t depend towards the twenty-year lifetime of a non-provisional software claiming precedence to the provisional, thus successfully extending the time period of patent safety.

Non-Provisional Functions
As mentioned above, a non-provisional software will be filed claiming the profit to a provisional software, claiming the profit to a overseas software, or as an authentic software. Non-provisional functions differ from provisional functions in that they have to embrace a number of claims, that are examined by the USPTO for patentability. Throughout examination, an Examiner compares the claims filed with prior artwork to make assessments on the novelty and inventiveness of the claims, and the applicant could reply to the Examiner’s findings with arguments and/or declare amendments.

As soon as a non-provisional software is filed, an applicant typically can not make any substantive adjustments or additions to the disclosure. That’s, if amending the claims throughout prosecution, the applicant is sure by and can’t lengthen past the disclosure of the non-provisional software as filed. Subsequently, it’s important that the technical description of the invention be as full as doable at submitting.

A number of follow-on functions, together with continuations, continuations-in-part, and divisionals, will be filed in the course of the pendency of the non-provisional software. Such functions are sometimes filed to pursue a special scope of declare protection than that obtained within the mother or father, or authentic, non-provisional software. These follow-on functions could also be strategically filed to pursue completely different embodiments and options of the invention. Subsequently, the disclosure of the non-provisional software needs to be as strong as doable to totally assist any embodiments which may be value pursuing in follow-on functions.

The non-provisional software will be filed straight in the US as a U.S. non-provisional software, as a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) software, or each. If filed as a PCT software solely, a U.S. non-provisional software will be filed primarily based on the PCT software inside 30 months of the earliest precedence date, together with nationwide non-provisional functions in different jurisdictions. This technique could get monetary savings on the submitting price(s) however will even delay the examination of the U.S. software.

Home Submitting Methods

The above submitting choices will be strategically utilized by rising robotics firms primarily based on their monetary standing and the maturity of their merchandise by way of growth and launching.

Leveraging Provisional and Non-Provisional Functions
As a result of provisional functions require fewer formalities and are charged a decrease submitting price, provisional functions are sometimes most well-liked to begin the patenting course of. Candidates could use the twelve-month interval to transform a provisional software right into a non-provisional software, to optimize the industrial embodiment of the invention coated within the provisional software, and to extra totally perceive the industrial implications of the product coated by the provisional software. As an illustration, the applicant could refine and check the design of the product, assess the market to find out the industrial viability of the product, and acquire capital from buyers for launching the product in the course of the twelve-month interval to transform the provisional product. One other industrial profit in the course of the twelve-month conversion interval is that the product coated by the provisional software will be labeled “patent pending.”

If enhancements or adjustments are made to the product in the course of the twelve-month conversion interval, the non-provisional software claiming precedence to the provisional software will be filed with an up to date specification overlaying these adjustments. Nonetheless, it’s important to understand {that a} declare within the non-provisional software is barely awarded the submitting date of the prior-filed provisional software whether it is totally supported within the description of the provisional software. Subsequently, any claims directed towards the subject material first disclosed within the non-provisional software shall be awarded the submitting date of the non-provisional software versus the provisional software. Because of this provisional functions needs to be drafted as fully as doable, ideally with an in depth specification resembling what shall be filed in a non-provisional software, so that every one, or as many claims as doable, of the non-provisional software are supported within the provisional software and awarded the provisional software’s submitting date. Furthermore, candidates can file further provisional functions because the adjustments happen and declare precedence to multiple provisional software.

Nonetheless, if the corporate has the mandatory capital and an invention is totally developed, such that the twelve-month interval for conversion gives little profit to an applicant, it might be finest to instantly file a non-provisional software directed towards the invention. By eliminating a possible provisional software and the related twelve-month conversion window from the submitting technique, the non-provisional software shall be examined, and hopefully issued, sooner.

Examination Course of
As soon as a non-provisional software is filed, the USPTO examines the claims of the applying, and the prosecution course of begins. Candidates needs to be conscious that it sometimes takes years from submitting a non-provisional software (or a direct or nationalized software in a overseas jurisdiction) till the applying is totally prosecuted and matures into an issued patent. Nonetheless, there are alternatives for expediting the examination and prosecution processes.

Monitor One
An applicant could request to take part within the Monitor One program with the USPTO when prosecuting a U.S. software. The request for Monitor One participation could also be submitted upon submitting of the applying or when submitting a Request for Continued Examination. Monitor One gives an software with a closing disposition (a Discover of Allowance or Ultimate Rejection) inside twelve months of submitting the request for participation in this system. Candidates abandon Monitor One process if an extension of time is taken when responding to an Workplace Motion or if the claims are amended to incorporate greater than 4 unbiased claims or thirty complete claims. The claims will be narrowly amended throughout Monitor One to make sure a fast allowance inside the twelve months. Then, a number of follow-on functions will be filed to pursue broader protection.

Patent Prosecution Freeway (PPH)
For candidates submitting functions in a number of international locations, the PPH program could also be an efficient technique to streamline and expedite prosecution throughout jurisdictions. The PPH is an settlement between collaborating jurisdictions, together with the US, PCT, China, Japan, South Korea, and the European Patent Workplace, that enables for an applicant to request expedited examination in a second jurisdiction the place substantive examination has not but begun primarily based on a good ruling on patentability of considerably corresponding claims in a primary jurisdiction. As an illustration, primarily based on a good opinion within the Written Opinion of the Worldwide Looking Authority (WOISA) rendered concerning the claims of a PCT software, participation within the PPH program could also be requested when prosecuting a corresponding U.S. non-provisional software.

Overseas Submitting Methods

As a result of the protection offered by a US patent is geographically restricted to the US, many firms additionally file overseas. Two avenues can be found for submitting patent functions in overseas jurisdictions. The primary is submitting a PCT software, which might then be entered in a number of international locations, and the second is submitting a direct overseas software. Candidates ought to anticipate to pay submitting charges, upkeep charges, translation prices, and charges for overseas attorneys who will seemingly help in submitting in every nation. Subsequently, to correctly allocate capital, candidates have to fastidiously decide which international locations are key territories in relation to the sale or manufacture of their product earlier than spending capital in pursuit of patent safety in jurisdictions that aren’t commercially related to their firm or space of robotics.


The above outlines a number of completely different submitting methods that an rising robotics firm ought to contemplate when constructing a portfolio. As a way to intelligently leverage the above methods, every with their very own distinctive necessities and related prices, an organization ought to try to fastidiously map out its industrial targets and venture the possibly shifting panorama of robotics applied sciences.

Concerning the Authors

This text was written by Roman Fayerberg, Shareholder at Greenberg Traurig LLP’s Boston workplace, Todd Basile, Shareholder at Greenberg Traurig LLP’s Dallas workplace, and Richard Brooks, Affiliate at Greenberg Traurig’s Boston workplace. Greenberg Traurig is a number one legislation follow with greater than 2650 attorneys in 45 areas in the US, Europe and the Center East, Latin America, and Asia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *